Many ideas, no shared priority
Departments propose tools and pilots without a common way to compare their value.
AI / AI transformation
Prioritise useful opportunities, test them against clear measures and build the ownership, skills and governance needed to operate what works.
Scope, timeline and pricing agreed after reviewing your needs.

Illustrative concept, not a live system or measured result.
Who this is for
For organisations with too many pilots, no shared way to prioritise them and unclear ownership or training once a demonstration ends.
Departments propose tools and pilots without a common way to compare their value.
A demonstration ends before ownership, integration and training are settled.
People need clear expectations, working practices and a place to raise concerns.
What you get
A workflow assessment, prioritisation by readiness, value and risk, baselines for each pilot, governance working practices and team enablement, delivered as advisory work.
Review workflows, available data and practical pain points with the people doing the work.
Compare value, feasibility, risk and readiness using an agreed scoring approach.
Give each proposed initiative an owner, dependency and evidence-based review gate.
Define the current process and success measures before building a pilot.
Develop use policies, review responsibilities and risk records with your internal specialists.
Plan role-specific guidance, training and the handover to the teams who will run the work.
How we work
Agree the criteria and an accountable owner, run scoped pilots against a baseline, then continue, change or stop each one using the evidence.

Interview teams and review processes, data readiness and existing experiments.
A shared picture of the opportunity.

Select a manageable shortlist and set owners, measures and pilot boundaries.
Fewer pilots, clearer reasons.

Test the chosen ideas and compare observed outcomes with the agreed baseline.
Keep the evidence visible.

Plan adoption, integrations and governance for approved initiatives, with an accountable owner.
The programme becomes everyday work.

Explore the possibilities
Illustrative concepts from our demo portfolio. They show possible experiences, not commissioned client projects, platform-specific implementations or measured results.

The team-workspace concept illustrates how initiatives, responsibilities and next decisions might be made visible across a programme.

The automation-workspace concept offers an example of a bounded workflow to assess. Any figures in the artwork are illustrative, not a savings forecast.
PLANS & INCLUDED BENEFITS
All three plans are fixed-term advisory engagements of two, four or six weeks, not production software builds or open-ended retainers. Compare interviews, workflow reviews, workshops and sessions; the 90-day roadmap is a planning horizon, not an implementation guarantee.
A two-week review to identify a practical starting point.
4,000SAR
/ project · excl. VATOne-time project fee. Support beyond the included period is quoted separately.
Included in your plan
Included in the starting price. Scope and limits are listed below.
A four-week plan for implementing and measuring selected pilots.
12,000SAR
/ project · excl. VATOne-time project fee. Support beyond the included period is quoted separately.
Included in your plan
Included in the starting price. Scope and limits are listed below.
Six weeks of advisory support for a team delivering its pilots.
25,000SAR
/ project · excl. VATOne-time project fee. Support beyond the included period is quoted separately.
Included in your plan
Included in the starting price. Scope and limits are listed below.
Starting prices in SAR, excluding VAT where applicable. Final scope and price are confirmed in your proposal. These are fixed-term advisory engagements, not software builds or open-ended retainers. Engineering, tool subscriptions and legal/compliance assessments are separate. Included leadership readout is one 60-minute session; the roadmap workshop is 90 minutes.
Before we start